Project Update
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hi,
We've got a blog post up with updates on the project.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hi,
We've got a new blog post up that gives an update on our data processing pipeline.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hi,
We've got another project update on the blog.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by p.titchin
Thanks for that Meg~pete
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hi,
Another update. Good news, today in the team call we froze development of the blotch pipeline. Blog post here.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by pete-j
Thanks for the update. Interesting problems. "When is a feature a blotch or a fan?" Depending on how obvious the feature is (how close to a fan or blotch in shape). Everyone interprets things differently...
Cheers 😃
PJ
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator in response to pete-j's comment.
Yep.
~Meg
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hi,
Another update on data processing with some results shown. This directly relates to pete-j's discussion of when is a feature a blotch or fan?. Sometimes it's both and our citizen science approach can identify that which is neat.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by pete-j
All interesting stuff!
Posted
-
by pete-j
Hi Meg,
I've just had my P4 talk today, essentially a follow-up of your lecture material, which I presented in June.
The questions, which came up after the talk from the society were:
- Is the North Polar region of Mars going to be investigated in the same way as the South polar region?
- What height are the geysers?
- Is there an imaging dataset, perhaps an experiment on a satellite, which could enable these heights to be measured more accurately?
- How often do we return to each of the imaged areas?
I gave partial answers to these questions; for example the last question - the HIRISE satellite, as far as I am aware has returned to some of the areas to see how things have developed.
Cheers,
Pete
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator in response to pete-j's comment.
Hi Pete,
Great to hear. Do you want to write a blog post about your talk? Then I could write a follow-up one answering those questions.
~Meg
Posted
-
by pete-j
Hi Meg,
OK, thanks for the opportunity! I'll do a write-up including the Q&A at the end. This time, no photos were taken.
Cheers,
Pete
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator in response to pete-j's comment.
Sounds great.
Thanks,
~Meg
Posted
-
by Kitharode moderator
Good work Pete-j. I look forward to your blog post and Meg's follow-up. 😃
Posted
-
by pete-j
I usually give about 2 talks per year and this was my best talk yet... Very satisfying.
A few years ago I was all nerves standing in front of everyone. However, not everyone will stand up and lecture and since the society meets every Thursday evening (where there is generally a slot for a talk) and there is always an opportunity to put ones name forward in the calendar...
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator in response to pete-j's comment.
Great to hear.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator in response to pete-j's comment.
Hi,
I've got another update based on this week's science team call. You can find it on the blog.
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted
-
by pete-j in response to mschwamb's comment.
I've subscribed to the blog, so I receive the update and don't miss the news 😃
PJ
Posted