Dark images can reveal all sorts of things
-
by JellyMonster
Dark images are sometimes ignored because they appear uninteresting at fist glance. Messing about with your monitors contrast/brightness settings helps but I don't recommend it. You are better off saving the image to disk first, then importing into an image editing program. Rotating it through 180° will help distinguish peaks from troughs. By altering the hightlight/shadow levels and perhaps a little sharpening you might be surprised at what you see.
If you go to the HiRISE image (greyscale/non-map) the spiders seem to be dislocated - what causes this?
![APF000188s] (https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/6a5f/osf4gaw3a127zt86g.jpg)
Posted
-
by p.titchin in response to JellyMonster's comment.
Great example Jelly, should really help people to understand the light orientation/ ridge or valley illusion. Nice boulders for my collection as well! 😃 Pete.
Posted
-
by JellyMonster
Thanks for your comment Pete. Obviously, everyone out there will have a different monitor set-up, so it still maybe too dark for some? Did you look at the HiRISE image?
Posted
-
by Kitharode moderator in response to JellyMonster's comment.
JM: You suggest a rotation of 90deg for the image. Do you mean 90? (I thought you did 180deg rotations). I've not seen the HiRise image yet - more later.
Some of the objects in the top left corner of the image above might be useful in Angie60's study.
Posted
-
by Kitharode moderator in response to JellyMonster's comment.
Finger Lake - Easy to see why it's an area of interest for the scientists.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'dislocated' spiders. Can you say more?
Posted
-
by JellyMonster
Kitharode, you're right it should be 180° and not 90 - good spot.
It looks to me that the spider 'body' has flattened out leaving dislocated legs everywhere - see HiRISE (Greyscale non-map).
Posted
-
by p.titchin in response to JellyMonster's comment.
Yes, I looked at the HiRISE, but like Kith, I was unsure what You meant by 'dislocated'. Now, Ive looked again, I think I see what you mean. The Finger Lake images often seem strange. I would like to see the underlying topography, but it adds to the mystery of the differences in spider form and evolution. Perhaps this is a stage in the evolution of a more organized 'spider network'. I'll see if I can find any more recent Finger Lake images. ~Pete
Posted
-
by Kitharode moderator
'Dislocated legs' - yes, I get it. No answers I'm afraid.
Can anybody remember if 2007 (the year of this image) was the year of the great dust storm, or was it 2009?
Posted
-
by mschwamb scientist, translator
Hiya,
The global dust storm was in 2007 between seasons 1 and 2 (http://blog.planetfour.org/2013/12/11/aftermath-of-a-global-dust-storm/)
Cheers,
~Meg
Posted